{"id":41805,"date":"2026-05-29T13:01:41","date_gmt":"2026-05-29T13:01:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/adspyder.io\/blog\/?p=41805"},"modified":"2026-05-29T13:37:37","modified_gmt":"2026-05-29T13:37:37","slug":"brand-keyword-bidding-banned","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/adspyder.io\/blog\/brand-keyword-bidding-banned\/","title":{"rendered":"We Analysed 25 of the World’s Biggest Brand Keyword Auctions | 8.5M Ads Reveal What Competitors Are Actually Doing in 2026"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
Brand Protection \u00b7 Original Data Study<\/span><\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

\n

Quick Answer<\/p>\n

AdSpyder analysed 8.5 million Google Search ads<\/strong> across 25 major brand keyword auctions<\/strong>. The finding: 13.1% of all brand-keyword ads come from competitors, not the brand itself.<\/strong> Netflix (72.1%) and Booking.com (69.9%) lose the most. Marketplaces like Mercado Libre (0%) and eBay (1.7%) are the most defended.<\/p>\n

In 2026, India’s Delhi High Court in Hindware Ltd. vs Google LLC<\/strong> permanently banned competitor bidding on registered trademark keywords \u2014 making this a legal issue, not just a PPC one. Use AdSpyder<\/a> to see who is bidding on your brand keyword right now. Source: AdSpyder platform data, May 2026.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

A customer types your brand name into Google. They already know you. This is the highest-intent traffic you will ever receive \u2014 built through years of marketing spend, word of mouth, and earned reputation.<\/p>\n

But before they reach your site, a competitor ad appears at the top. Your brand created the demand. Someone else may capture the click.<\/p>\n

This is the core problem behind brand keyword bidding. In 2026, India’s Delhi High Court made it a legal problem too \u2014 for the first time establishing clear precedent that competitor bidding on a registered trademark is trademark infringement, even when the brand name is never visible in the ad itself.<\/p>\n

This study is AdSpyder’s original data. We went into our Google Search Ads archive \u2014 164 million+ ads \u2014 pulled every ad containing a major brand name in its headline, then separated the brand’s own ads from everyone else’s across 25 brands and 8.5 million ads. The results show how big the problem actually is, which industries get hit hardest, and exactly who is doing the bidding.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\n

In This Article<\/p>\n

\ud83c\uddee\ud83c\uddf3 The Delhi HC Ruling<\/a>
\n\ud83d\udcca Methodology<\/a>
\n\ud83d\udccc Key Findings<\/a>
\n\ud83d\udccb Full Brand Table<\/a>
\n\ud83d\udd0d Who Bids on Who<\/a>
\n\ud83c\udfed Industry Patterns<\/a>
\n\ud83d\udde3\ufe0f Conquesting Language<\/a>
\n\u2705 How to Monitor Your Brand<\/a>
\n\u274c Mistakes to Avoid<\/a>
\n\u2611 Checklist<\/a>
\n\u2753 FAQ<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n

<\/p>\n

The Delhi HC Ruling That Changed Brand Bidding in India Forever<\/h2>\n

This section comes first because it changes the entire context of what follows. Brand keyword bidding is no longer just a PPC efficiency question in India. After the Hindware ruling, it is a trademark infringement question with legal consequences for both the advertiser doing the bidding and the platform enabling it.<\/p>\n

On 22 May 2026, Justice Mini Pushkarna of the Delhi High Court delivered a 163-page judgment in Hindware Ltd. vs Google LLC<\/strong>. Hindware, one of India’s largest sanitaryware manufacturers with a registered trademark since 1991, had discovered in 2013 that competitors Cera Sanitaryware and Grohe India were purchasing “HINDWARE” as a Google Ads keyword. When users searched for Hindware, competitor ads appeared above Hindware’s own organic result.<\/p>\n

Cera and Grohe settled during the case. Google contested its own liability for 13 years \u2014 and lost.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\n
\n

163<\/p>\n

Pages in the judgment<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

\u20b930L<\/p>\n

Damages awarded to Hindware<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

13 yrs<\/p>\n

Discovery to final verdict<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Zero<\/p>\n

Safe harbour for Google<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

Three findings from the judgment matter for every brand in India:<\/p>\n

1. Invisible keyword use is still trademark infringement.<\/strong> Google argued that because keywords are backend triggers never shown to the user, they cannot be “use” of a trademark. The court held that using a registered trademark as a keyword to trigger an ad constitutes use in advertising under Section 29(6)(d) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 \u2014 regardless of whether the trademark appears in the visible ad.<\/p>\n

2. Google is an active participant, not a neutral platform.<\/strong> Google’s Keyword Planner recommends competitor trademarks to advertisers. Its auction system earns revenue from every click triggered by your trademark. The court rejected the “neutral intermediary” defence entirely.<\/p>\n

3. Safe harbour under the IT Act was denied.<\/strong> Section 79 of the IT Act protects passive intermediaries. Because Google actively selects who sees your brand’s search results and profits from it, the court denied the protection.<\/p>\n

\n

Scope \u2014 who this applies to<\/p>\n

This ruling applies to registered trademarks in India<\/strong>. The precedent is that competitor bidding on a registered trademark as a Google Ads keyword is legally actionable \u2014 against both the competing advertiser and Google. The bigger operational challenge is knowing when it is happening. Most brands discover competitor brand bidding months after it starts, after traffic has already leaked. Read the full ruling analysis: Delhi HC Brand Bidding Ruling: What Hindware vs Google Means for Every Indian Brand \u2192<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

\n

Is a competitor bidding on your brand keyword right now?<\/p>\n

Search your brand name in AdSpyder’s 164M+ Google Search Ads archive and see exactly who is running ads on your keyword \u2014 their copy, their landing page, how long they have been running.<\/p>\n

Check Your Brand Keyword \u2192<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

<\/p>\n

Methodology: How We Analysed 8.5 Million Brand Keyword Ads<\/h2>\n

AdSpyder Google Search Ads archive \u00b7 2026 \u00b7 25 brands \u00b7 8,523,737 ads<\/p>\n

We selected 25 globally recognised brand names across seven industry categories: e-commerce marketplaces, travel and hospitality, fashion and footwear, consumer electronics, design SaaS, streaming entertainment, and productivity SaaS. Regulated categories \u2014 finance, insurance, healthcare, pharma \u2014 were excluded because different ad-disclosure rules make cross-industry comparison unreliable.<\/p>\n

For each brand, we queried AdSpyder’s Google Search Ads archive \u2014 164 million+ ads with first-seen dates from 2009 through 2026 \u2014 and extracted every ad containing the brand name in its headline. We then identified the top 50 advertisers by ad count for each brand keyword and classified each as either the brand’s own domain or a conquesting advertiser.<\/p>\n

\n

What counts as a conquesting advertiser<\/p>\n

Any non-brand-domain advertiser running a headline ad containing the brand name. This includes direct competitors, marketplaces reselling the brand, affiliates, coupon and voucher sites, comparison sites, alternative SaaS tools, and lead-gen aggregators. The top-50 cohort covers approximately 85% of brand-in-title ads for each keyword. Source: AdSpyder platform data, May 2026.<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

<\/p>\n

Key Findings: Brand Keyword Bidding in 2026<\/h2>\n

AdSpyder Google Search Ads archive \u00b7 25 brands \u00b7 8,523,737 ads<\/p>\n

\n
\n

13.1%<\/p>\n

Aggregate competitor share<\/p>\n

1 in 8 ads on a major brand’s keyword comes from a competitor, not the brand<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

72.1%<\/p>\n

Netflix \u2014 most conquested brand<\/p>\n

Nearly 3 in 4 “Netflix” headline ads come from advertisers other than Netflix<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

311k<\/p>\n

“Alternative to” ads<\/p>\n

Explicit competitor positioning against named brands, across 164M ads<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

5.27M<\/p>\n

“Official” ads<\/p>\n

Signals used for brand defence \u2014 and by look-alike impostors<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

Source: AdSpyder platform data, May 2026. Google Search archive covers ad first-seen dates 2019\u20132026.<\/p>\n

\n

<\/p>\n

Brand Keyword Competitor Bidding Benchmark 2026: Full Results<\/h2>\n

25 brands \u00b7 8,523,737 Google Search ads \u00b7 Sorted by competitor share \u00b7 AdSpyder platform data, 2026<\/p>\n

The table below is the complete dataset. “Total ads” is the count of Google Search ads with the brand name in the headline. “Competitor ads” is from all non-brand-domain advertisers in the top-50 cohort. “Competitor %” is the share of branded search real estate that goes to non-brand advertisers.<\/p>\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
#<\/th>\nBrand<\/th>\nIndustry<\/th>\nTotal Ads<\/th>\nCompetitor Ads<\/th>\nCompetitor %<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
1<\/td>\nNetflix<\/td>\nStreaming<\/td>\n57,001<\/td>\n27,430<\/td>\n72.1%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2<\/td>\nBooking.com<\/td>\nTravel \/ Hospitality<\/td>\n348,582<\/td>\n131,806<\/td>\n69.9%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
3<\/td>\nSamsung<\/td>\nConsumer Electronics<\/td>\n747,122<\/td>\n210,266<\/td>\n54.4%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
4<\/td>\nNike<\/td>\nFootwear \/ Apparel<\/td>\n824,734<\/td>\n236,004<\/td>\n47.5%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
5<\/td>\nDisney<\/td>\nStreaming \/ Entertainment<\/td>\n373,538<\/td>\n59,264<\/td>\n22.3%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
6<\/td>\nAdobe<\/td>\nDesign SaaS<\/td>\n302,379<\/td>\n34,581<\/td>\n15.1%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
7<\/td>\nAlibaba<\/td>\nB2B Marketplace<\/td>\n24,805<\/td>\n2,864<\/td>\n13.9%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
8<\/td>\nShopify<\/td>\nE-commerce SaaS<\/td>\n155,535<\/td>\n11,712<\/td>\n13.3%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
9<\/td>\nAliExpress<\/td>\nCross-border E-commerce<\/td>\n117,342<\/td>\n7,968<\/td>\n9.3%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
10<\/td>\nCanva<\/td>\nDesign SaaS<\/td>\n100,877<\/td>\n6,550<\/td>\n7.6%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
11<\/td>\nAmazon<\/td>\nMarketplace<\/td>\n2,704,091<\/td>\n138,176<\/td>\n5.5%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
12<\/td>\nSHEIN<\/td>\nFast Fashion<\/td>\n337,629<\/td>\n15,672<\/td>\n5.3%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
13<\/td>\nTemu<\/td>\nCross-border E-commerce<\/td>\n5,643<\/td>\n240<\/td>\n4.5%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
14<\/td>\nGrammarly<\/td>\nProductivity SaaS<\/td>\n96,938<\/td>\n3,634<\/td>\n4.3%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
15<\/td>\nFlipkart<\/td>\nMarketplace (India)<\/td>\n17,246<\/td>\n642<\/td>\n4.3%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
16<\/td>\nMyntra<\/td>\nFashion (India)<\/td>\n35,969<\/td>\n1,474<\/td>\n4.3%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
17<\/td>\nWalmart<\/td>\nBig-box Retail<\/td>\n121,866<\/td>\n3,679<\/td>\n3.5%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
18<\/td>\nEtsy<\/td>\nMarketplace<\/td>\n94,186<\/td>\n2,986<\/td>\n3.4%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
19<\/td>\nUdemy<\/td>\nEdTech<\/td>\n259,330<\/td>\n6,954<\/td>\n2.8%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
20<\/td>\neBay<\/td>\nMarketplace<\/td>\n371,491<\/td>\n5,945<\/td>\n1.7%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
21<\/td>\nExpedia<\/td>\nTravel \/ Hospitality<\/td>\n169,566<\/td>\n1,626<\/td>\n1.1%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
22<\/td>\nTrendyol<\/td>\nMarketplace (Turkey)<\/td>\n154,432<\/td>\n1,482<\/td>\n1.0%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
23<\/td>\nASOS<\/td>\nFashion<\/td>\n413,698<\/td>\n1,769<\/td>\n0.4%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
24<\/td>\nAgoda<\/td>\nTravel \/ Hospitality<\/td>\n75,191<\/td>\n227<\/td>\n0.3%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
25<\/td>\nMercado Libre<\/td>\nMarketplace (LATAM)<\/td>\n614,546<\/td>\n0<\/td>\n0.0%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n
Total \/ Aggregate<\/td>\n8,523,737<\/td>\n912,951<\/td>\n13.1%<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tfoot>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n

Source: AdSpyder platform data, May 2026. Google Search archive, ad first-seen dates 2018\u20132024. Top-50 advertiser cohort per brand covers ~85% of brand-in-title ads.<\/p>\n

\"Brand<\/p>\n

\n

<\/p>\n

Who Is Actually Bidding on These Brand Keywords?<\/h2>\n

Top conquesting advertisers by brand \u2014 AdSpyder Google Search Ads archive, May 2026<\/p>\n

The aggregate number tells you how much branded real estate is being lost. The advertiser breakdown tells you who is taking it and why. The pattern is industry-specific \u2014 and understanding the type of competitor you face determines the right response.<\/p>\n

Booking.com (70% conquered): OTAs and travel aggregators<\/h3>\n

The top conquesting advertisers on “Booking” branded keywords are Agoda (15,417 ads), Trivago UK (9,923), MakeMyTrip (7,654), Goibibo (6,684), RedBus (6,543), Trivago.com (6,329), Airpaz (5,067), and Cleartrip (4,793). Every major OTA and travel meta-search platform is present. The keyword “booking” sits at the edge of branded intent and generic action \u2014 which makes it one of the most competitively contested travel brand keywords in the archive.<\/p>\n

Nike (47% conquered): multi-brand fashion retailers<\/h3>\n

ASOS (24,876 ads), Sneaksup (12,569), JD Sports UK (10,508), Farfetch (10,470), Dexter Argentina (9,236), Barcin (8,726), Finish Line (8,493), and Lyst (7,351) all appear on “Nike” brand keywords. Many are legitimate authorised retailers \u2014 but they still intercept branded demand and redirect that traffic through their own customer journey, at Nike’s brand-building cost. For Indian apparel brands in a similar position, the Hindware ruling now makes this a legally contestable issue.<\/p>\n

Adobe (15% conquered): SaaS alternatives and learning platforms<\/h3>\n

Udemy (5,864 ads), Domestika (2,758), Filmora\/Wondershare (2,560), Lenovo (2,203), Skillshare (1,729), LinkedIn Learning (1,663), Envato Elements (1,177), and Wondershare PDF (1,077) target Adobe brand keywords. The intent here is deliberate: “Alternative to Adobe”, “Cheaper than Photoshop”, “Adobe Premiere alternative”. This is the pure “alternative to” attack \u2014 unambiguous competitor positioning against the incumbent SaaS brand.<\/p>\n

Samsung (54% conquered): marketplaces reselling the brand’s products<\/h3>\n

Amazon India (15,386 ads), Trendyol (10,855), and Hepsiburada (10,255) dominate Samsung’s brand keyword competition. Unlike the Adobe case, these are not saying “use something else instead”. They are selling Samsung products \u2014 but doing it in a way that captures Samsung’s branded demand, removes Samsung’s direct customer relationship, and gives the marketplace control over the post-click experience. Even reseller bidding has a cost.<\/p>\n

\n

<\/p>\n

The Industry Pattern: Your Brand’s Risk Profile<\/h2>\n

Brand keyword competition maps cleanly to business model \u2014 not just category<\/p>\n

The variation across 25 brands is not random noise. It follows a clear structural principle: the more exclusive you are as the source of your product, the more competitors bid on your keyword.<\/strong> Streaming services lose the most because there is no legitimate reseller \u2014 only alternatives. Marketplaces lose the least because their brand and their product are the same thing.<\/p>\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Brand Type<\/th>\nTypical Competitor %<\/th>\nWho Bids on You<\/th>\nExamples<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
Single-content streaming<\/td>\n47\u201372%<\/span><\/td>\nCompeting streamers, VPNs, coupon sites<\/td>\nNetflix, Disney<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Single-brand electronics<\/td>\n~54%<\/span><\/td>\nMarketplaces reselling the brand<\/td>\nSamsung<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Single-brand apparel<\/td>\n~48%<\/span><\/td>\nMulti-brand fashion retailers, comparison sites<\/td>\nNike<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Design \/ e-commerce SaaS<\/td>\n8\u201315%<\/span><\/td>\nCompeting SaaS tools, learning platforms<\/td>\nAdobe, Shopify, Canva<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Indian e-commerce<\/td>\n~4%<\/span><\/td>\nCategory-adjacent platforms<\/td>\nFlipkart, Myntra<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Global marketplaces<\/td>\n0\u20132%<\/span><\/td>\nAlmost no one \u2014 the platform IS the product<\/td>\nMercado Libre, eBay, ASOS, Trendyol, Agoda<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n

Source: AdSpyder platform data, May 2026. Competitor % ranges derived from the 25-brand dataset above.<\/p>\n

For Indian brands \u2014 specifically those in SaaS, D2C, e-commerce, EdTech, fintech, travel, and consumer electronics \u2014 the data and the Hindware ruling converge on the same conclusion: brand keyword monitoring is no longer optional. Use AdSpyder’s Ad Library<\/a> to establish your baseline and track changes over time.<\/p>\n

\"The<\/p>\n

\n

<\/p>\n

The Language of Brand Bidding: What 164 Million Ads Reveal<\/h2>\n

Keyword-based phrase classifier \u00b7 164,707,232 Google Search ads \u00b7 AdSpyder platform data<\/p>\n

Beyond the per-brand data, we scanned the full 164 million+ Google Search ad archive for the specific phrases that signal brand keyword activity. Two signals anchor the landscape: “official”<\/strong> is how brands defend. “Alternative to”<\/strong> is how competitors attack.<\/p>\n

\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Phrase<\/th>\nAds Found<\/th>\n% of Archive<\/th>\nSignal<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
“official” (any)<\/td>\n5,275,074<\/td>\n3.20%<\/td>\nBrand Defence \/ Look-alike<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
“reviews” or “review”<\/td>\n3,332,768<\/td>\n2.02%<\/td>\nCompetitor \/ Comparison<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
“official site”<\/td>\n3,187,192<\/td>\n1.94%<\/td>\nBrand Defence \/ Look-alike<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
“compare prices”<\/td>\n475,331<\/td>\n0.29%<\/td>\nComparison Site<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
“alternative to”<\/td>\n268,596<\/td>\n0.16%<\/td>\nDirect Competitor Attack<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
“genuine”<\/td>\n274,117<\/td>\n0.17%<\/td>\nBrand Defence<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
“vs”<\/td>\n254,940<\/td>\n0.15%<\/td>\nComparison<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
“better than”<\/td>\n82,642<\/td>\n0.05%<\/td>\nDirect Competitor Attack<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
“alternative to” + “alternatives to” combined<\/td>\n310,585<\/td>\n0.19%<\/td>\nDirect Competitor Attack<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n

Source: AdSpyder platform data, May 2026. Full 164,707,232-ad Google Search archive.<\/p>\n

“Alternative to” bidding is most concentrated in the US (74,833 ads), India (43,575), UK (30,232), Canada (25,447), and Germany (14,573). India is the second-largest market for “alternative to” brand attacking<\/strong> \u2014 and now the jurisdiction where it is most legally exposed after the Hindware ruling.<\/p>\n

\n

Pay particular attention to “official” signals<\/p>\n

5.27 million Google Search ads use the word “official”. Some of these are your own brand-defence ads. Others are look-alike advertisers or impostors creating trust signals to intercept your brand traffic. After the Hindware ruling, any non-authorised advertiser using “official” language on your registered trademark keyword is in significantly riskier legal territory than before May 2026.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

<\/p>\n

How to Monitor Competitor Brand Bidding With AdSpyder<\/h2>\n

A repeatable workflow for PPC managers, brand teams, and legal departments<\/p>\n

More than half of all AdSpyder Ad Library searches (56.4% of 88,035+ searches from 6,859 users) are brand-or-domain lookups. Checking competitors by brand name is already the majority use case. Here is the systematic workflow to do it properly.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

\n
1<\/div>\n
\n

Search your brand keyword \u2014 and its variations<\/p>\n

Go to the Google Ads Spy tool<\/a> and search your main brand name. Then expand to variations: brand + pricing, brand + login, brand + coupon, brand + discount, brand + alternative, brand + reviews, brand + product name, common misspellings. Each variation can have different competitors.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

\n
2<\/div>\n
\n

Separate brand-own ads from competitor ads<\/p>\n

Filter out your own domain. Then classify the remaining advertisers: direct competitor, marketplace, reseller, affiliate, coupon site, review site, comparison page, or lead-gen aggregator. Each type requires a different response \u2014 a direct competitor may need brand defence strategy, a misleading advertiser may need legal escalation.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

\n
3<\/div>\n
\n

Review the full ad \u2014 headline, description, display URL<\/p>\n

Look for: your brand name in the headline, “official” language, “alternative to” or “better than” copy, trademark-like wording, misleading claims. In India after the Hindware ruling, your brand name appearing in a competitor’s headline on your registered trademark keyword is now legally significant \u2014 save screenshots with date and market.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

\n
4<\/div>\n
\n

Check the landing page \u2014 do not stop at the ad<\/p>\n

The ad copy is often the mild version. The landing page may compare your brand directly, present itself as official, rank alternatives, or use your trademark in metadata. Use AdSpyder’s Landing Page Analysis<\/a> to understand the full post-click destination without manually opening every link.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

\n
5<\/div>\n
\n

Build a brand auction report and set ongoing tracking<\/p>\n

A complete report should capture: keyword searched, advertiser domain, ad headline, description, landing page URL, date, country, and risk level. Add repeat offenders to your AdSpyder competitor tracking projects. AdSpyder currently tracks 3,687 competitors across 8,663+ active projects \u2014 the infrastructure for systematic brand monitoring is already there.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

\n
6<\/div>\n
\n

Enable Brand Keyword Alerts \u2014 coming soon<\/p>\n

Most brands in this dataset discovered competitor brand bidding long after it started. AdSpyder is building a real-time Brand Keyword Alert feature that will notify you the moment a new competitor ad appears on your brand keyword \u2014 enabling immediate detection rather than delayed discovery. Manual spot-checks catch what is already running. Alerts catch what just started.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

\n

<\/p>\n

5 Brand Keyword Monitoring Mistakes to Avoid<\/h2>\n
\n

\u274c Checking brand keywords only once<\/p>\n

Brand auctions change constantly. Competitors run time-limited campaigns during launches, seasonal periods, or discount windows. A one-time check is a snapshot, not a monitoring practice. Set a weekly or bi-weekly cadence \u2014 especially for Indian brands after the Hindware ruling, where the legal window for action depends on how early you detect the activity.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

\u274c Looking only at direct competitors<\/p>\n

The data shows that many of the most aggressive brand keyword bidders are not direct competitors at all \u2014 they are affiliates, coupon sites, marketplaces, comparison pages, and review aggregators. On the Nike keyword, the biggest conquester was ASOS \u2014 a retailer, not a rival shoe brand. Track all non-brand advertisers, not only obvious competitors.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

\u274c Treating marketplace\/reseller bidding as harmless<\/p>\n

Amazon bidding on Samsung’s brand keyword is not neutral \u2014 it redirects branded traffic through Amazon’s checkout, removes Samsung’s direct customer relationship, and gives Amazon the first-party data. Even when the reseller sells your authentic product, the loss of the direct relationship, margin, and upsell opportunity is real. Samsung’s 54% conquesting rate is dominated by resellers, not direct rivals.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

\u274c Stopping at the ad \u2014 ignoring the landing page<\/p>\n

Ad copy is often conservative. The landing page is where the real positioning happens: brand comparison tables, “we are better than X” claims, fake “official” branding, lead-gen forms capturing your branded demand. Use Landing Page Analysis<\/a> to see the full post-click destination. For Indian brands with registered trademarks, trademark usage on a competitor’s landing page is part of the legal evidence.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

\u274c Waiting until CPC increases before acting<\/p>\n

By the time your branded CPC rises noticeably, competitors have already been running for weeks. Traffic has leaked. Revenue has been affected. Brand keyword monitoring needs to be proactive \u2014 build the weekly check into your routine, not your incident response.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

<\/p>\n

Brand Keyword Protection Checklist \u2014 Run This Every Week<\/h2>\n
\n
\n

Weekly brand keyword audit<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

\u2713<\/span><\/p>\n

Search your main brand name in AdSpyder Google Ads Spy<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

\u2713<\/span><\/p>\n

Search brand + pricing, brand + coupon, brand + alternative, brand + review, brand + vs<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

\u2713<\/span><\/p>\n

Classify each non-brand advertiser: direct competitor \/ marketplace \/ affiliate \/ coupon \/ review \/ impostor<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

\u2713<\/span><\/p>\n

Review ad copy \u2014 flag any “official”, “alternative to”, “better than”, or trademark-like language<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

\u2713<\/span><\/p>\n

Check the landing page for each flagged advertiser using Landing Page Analysis<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

\u2713<\/span><\/p>\n

Save evidence: advertiser domain, ad copy, landing URL, date, market \u2014 especially for Indian registered trademarks<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

\u2713<\/span><\/p>\n

Escalate any registered trademark violations to legal team with the full evidence package<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

\u2713<\/span><\/p>\n

Track repeat offenders in your AdSpyder competitor projects \u2014 monitor changes in their ad volume and copy<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

<\/p>\n

\n

Get your personalised brand keyword competition report \u2014 powered by AdSpyder data<\/p>\n

See who is bidding on your brand keyword across 164M+ Google Search ads. Review their copy, their landing pages, and how long they have been running. The Delhi HC ruling gives you the legal standing. AdSpyder gives you the evidence.<\/p>\n

Start Your Brand Keyword Search \u2192<\/a>
\nExplore the Full Ad Library<\/a><\/div>\n

23,000+ registered users \u00b7 360M+ ads indexed \u00b7 10 platforms \u00b7 AdSpyder platform data<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n

<\/p>\n

Frequently Asked Questions<\/h2>\n
\nIs brand keyword bidding legal in India after the Hindware vs Google ruling? +<\/span><\/summary>\n

No \u2014 for registered trademarks. The Delhi High Court in Hindware Ltd. vs Google LLC<\/em> (May 22, 2026) ruled that bidding on a competitor’s registered trademark as a keyword constitutes trademark infringement under the Trade Marks Act, 1999 \u2014 even if the trademark is never visible in the final ad. Google was permanently restrained. Any competitor bidding on your registered Indian trademark keyword now faces direct legal liability. Read the full analysis: Delhi HC Brand Bidding Ruling 2026 \u2192<\/a><\/p>\n<\/details>\n

\nWhat percentage of brand keyword ads come from competitors on average? +<\/span><\/summary>\n

In AdSpyder’s study of 8.5 million Google Search ads across 25 major brand keywords, the aggregate competitor share is 13.1%. The range is wide: Netflix (72.1%), Booking.com (69.9%), Samsung (54.4%), Nike (47.5%) lose the most. Mercado Libre (0%), Agoda (0.3%), ASOS (0.4%), and eBay (1.7%) are the best-defended. Source: AdSpyder platform data, May 2026.<\/p>\n<\/details>\n

\nWhich industries face the highest brand keyword competition? +<\/span><\/summary>\n

Streaming services face the highest rates (Netflix 72%, Disney 22%). Consumer electronics single-brands face heavy reseller bidding (Samsung 54%). Single-brand apparel faces multi-brand retailer bidding (Nike 48%). SaaS brands face “alternative to” competitor positioning (Adobe 15%, Shopify 13%, Canva 8%). Marketplaces are the most protected (Mercado Libre 0%, eBay 1.7%). Indian e-commerce sits in a lower-risk tier (Flipkart and Myntra both at 4.3%).<\/p>\n<\/details>\n

\nWhat is conquesting in PPC? +<\/span><\/summary>\n

Conquesting is when an advertiser bids on another brand’s keyword to intercept that brand’s high-intent search traffic. In paid search, it means your ad appears when someone is specifically looking for a competitor. Conquesting includes direct rivals, resellers, affiliates, comparison sites, and coupon pages \u2014 they share the outcome (capturing your branded demand) but require different responses from the brand being conquested.<\/p>\n<\/details>\n

\nHow do I check if competitors are bidding on my brand keyword? +<\/span><\/summary>\n

Search your brand name in AdSpyder’s Google Ads Spy tool<\/a>. Filter out your own domain \u2014 everything remaining is a conquesting advertiser. Review their ad copy, check their landing page using Landing Page Analysis<\/a>, and use Domain Analysis<\/a> for a full view of each competitor’s broader ad activity.<\/p>\n<\/details>\n

\nDoes the Hindware ruling apply outside of Google Search? +<\/span><\/summary>\n

The ruling specifically addressed Google Ads keyword bidding. But the legal reasoning \u2014 that invisible trademark use in an advertising trigger constitutes “use in advertising” under the Trade Marks Act, 1999 \u2014 is not platform-specific. Similar arguments could be applied to keyword targeting on Bing, Meta, and other ad platforms. Legal counsel should advise on specific platforms and trademark registrations.<\/p>\n<\/details>\n

\nWhat should I do if a competitor is bidding on my brand name? +<\/span><\/summary>\n

Collect evidence first: save the keyword, advertiser domain, ad copy, landing page URL, date, and market. Then classify the threat \u2014 direct competitor, reseller, affiliate, or impostor. Share the findings with your PPC, brand, and legal teams. In India, if the brand is a registered trademark, the Hindware ruling gives you legal grounds to escalate against both the advertiser and Google. Use AdSpyder to build a comprehensive evidence package before approaching legal counsel.<\/p>\n<\/details>\n

\nCan I check brand keyword activity on platforms other than Google? +<\/span><\/summary>\n

Yes. AdSpyder covers 10 platforms with 360M+ ads. Use Facebook Ads Spy<\/a> and Instagram Ads Spy<\/a> for Meta, Bing Ads Spy<\/a> for Microsoft, YouTube Ads Spy<\/a> for video, and LinkedIn Ad Library<\/a> for B2B. Brand keyword bidding is a cross-platform issue \u2014 a competitor blocked on Google may continue on Bing or Meta.<\/p>\n<\/details>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Brand Protection \u00b7 Original Data Study Quick Answer AdSpyder analysed […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":27,"featured_media":41811,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[505],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-41805","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-brand-protection"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"\nBrand Keyword Bidding Banned in India May 2026 | 8.5M Ad Study<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Delhi HC banned competitor brand keyword bidding in India. AdSpyder analysed 8.5M ads: Netflix loses 72% of branded search to rivals.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/adspyder.io\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/41805\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Brand Keyword Bidding Banned in India May 2026 | 8.5M Ad Study\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Delhi HC banned competitor brand keyword bidding in India. AdSpyder analysed 8.5M ads: Netflix loses 72% of branded search to rivals.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/adspyder.io\/blog\/brand-keyword-bidding-banned\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"AdSpyder\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2026-05-29T13:01:41+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2026-05-29T13:37:37+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/adspyder.io\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Who-is-Stealing-Your-Brand-Keyword.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1731\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"909\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Abhishek Singh\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Abhishek Singh\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"17 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/adspyder.io\/blog\/brand-keyword-bidding-banned\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/adspyder.io\/blog\/brand-keyword-bidding-banned\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Abhishek Singh\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/adspyder.io\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/019f20ac9229517cfc2d66b908b656f0\"},\"headline\":\"We Analysed 25 of the World’s Biggest Brand Keyword Auctions | 8.5M Ads Reveal What Competitors Are Actually Doing in 2026\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-05-29T13:01:41+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-05-29T13:37:37+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/adspyder.io\/blog\/brand-keyword-bidding-banned\/\"},\"wordCount\":3328,\"commentCount\":0,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/adspyder.io\/blog\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/adspyder.io\/blog\/brand-keyword-bidding-banned\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/adspyder.io\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Who-is-Stealing-Your-Brand-Keyword.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Brand Protection\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/adspyder.io\/blog\/brand-keyword-bidding-banned\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/adspyder.io\/blog\/brand-keyword-bidding-banned\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/adspyder.io\/blog\/brand-keyword-bidding-banned\/\",\"name\":\"Brand Keyword Bidding Banned in India May 2026 | 8.5M Ad Study\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/adspyder.io\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/adspyder.io\/blog\/brand-keyword-bidding-banned\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/adspyder.io\/blog\/brand-keyword-bidding-banned\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/adspyder.io\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Who-is-Stealing-Your-Brand-Keyword.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2026-05-29T13:01:41+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2026-05-29T13:37:37+00:00\",\"description\":\"Delhi HC banned competitor brand keyword bidding in India. AdSpyder analysed 8.5M ads: Netflix loses 72% of branded search to rivals.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/adspyder.io\/blog\/brand-keyword-bidding-banned\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/adspyder.io\/blog\/brand-keyword-bidding-banned\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/adspyder.io\/blog\/brand-keyword-bidding-banned\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/adspyder.io\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Who-is-Stealing-Your-Brand-Keyword.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/adspyder.io\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Who-is-Stealing-Your-Brand-Keyword.jpg\",\"width\":1731,\"height\":909,\"caption\":\"Who is Stealing Your Brand Keyword\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/adspyder.io\/blog\/brand-keyword-bidding-banned\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"blog\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/adspyder.io\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Brand Protection\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/adspyder.io\/blog\/category\/brand-protection\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"We Analysed 25 of the World’s Biggest Brand Keyword Auctions | 8.5M Ads Reveal What Competitors Are Actually Doing in 2026\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/adspyder.io\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/adspyder.io\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"AdSpyder\",\"description\":\"Spy on Your Competitors\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/adspyder.io\/blog\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/adspyder.io\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/adspyder.io\/blog\/#organization\",\"name\":\"AdSpyder\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/adspyder.io\/blog\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/adspyder.io\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/adspyder.io\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/MicrosoftTeams-image-89-1.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/adspyder.io\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/MicrosoftTeams-image-89-1.png\",\"width\":300,\"height\":300,\"caption\":\"AdSpyder\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/adspyder.io\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/adspyder.io\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/019f20ac9229517cfc2d66b908b656f0\",\"name\":\"Abhishek Singh\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/adspyder.io\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/ecceb4f04c0c06c78df7d35567f4c454e8db1d7d2bd4ca394f3785876c606703?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/ecceb4f04c0c06c78df7d35567f4c454e8db1d7d2bd4ca394f3785876c606703?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Abhishek Singh\"},\"url\":\"https:\/\/adspyder.io\/blog\/author\/abhishek\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Brand Keyword Bidding Banned in India May 2026 | 8.5M Ad Study","description":"Delhi HC banned competitor brand keyword bidding in India. AdSpyder analysed 8.5M ads: Netflix loses 72% of branded search to rivals.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/adspyder.io\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/41805","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Brand Keyword Bidding Banned in India May 2026 | 8.5M Ad Study","og_description":"Delhi HC banned competitor brand keyword bidding in India. AdSpyder analysed 8.5M ads: Netflix loses 72% of branded search to rivals.","og_url":"https:\/\/adspyder.io\/blog\/brand-keyword-bidding-banned\/","og_site_name":"AdSpyder","article_published_time":"2026-05-29T13:01:41+00:00","article_modified_time":"2026-05-29T13:37:37+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1731,"height":909,"url":"https:\/\/adspyder.io\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Who-is-Stealing-Your-Brand-Keyword.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Abhishek Singh","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Abhishek Singh","Est. reading time":"17 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/adspyder.io\/blog\/brand-keyword-bidding-banned\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/adspyder.io\/blog\/brand-keyword-bidding-banned\/"},"author":{"name":"Abhishek Singh","@id":"https:\/\/adspyder.io\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/019f20ac9229517cfc2d66b908b656f0"},"headline":"We Analysed 25 of the World’s Biggest Brand Keyword Auctions | 8.5M Ads Reveal What Competitors Are Actually Doing in 2026","datePublished":"2026-05-29T13:01:41+00:00","dateModified":"2026-05-29T13:37:37+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/adspyder.io\/blog\/brand-keyword-bidding-banned\/"},"wordCount":3328,"commentCount":0,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/adspyder.io\/blog\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/adspyder.io\/blog\/brand-keyword-bidding-banned\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/adspyder.io\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Who-is-Stealing-Your-Brand-Keyword.jpg","articleSection":["Brand Protection"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/adspyder.io\/blog\/brand-keyword-bidding-banned\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/adspyder.io\/blog\/brand-keyword-bidding-banned\/","url":"https:\/\/adspyder.io\/blog\/brand-keyword-bidding-banned\/","name":"Brand Keyword Bidding Banned in India May 2026 | 8.5M Ad Study","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/adspyder.io\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/adspyder.io\/blog\/brand-keyword-bidding-banned\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/adspyder.io\/blog\/brand-keyword-bidding-banned\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/adspyder.io\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Who-is-Stealing-Your-Brand-Keyword.jpg","datePublished":"2026-05-29T13:01:41+00:00","dateModified":"2026-05-29T13:37:37+00:00","description":"Delhi HC banned competitor brand keyword bidding in India. AdSpyder analysed 8.5M ads: Netflix loses 72% of branded search to rivals.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/adspyder.io\/blog\/brand-keyword-bidding-banned\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/adspyder.io\/blog\/brand-keyword-bidding-banned\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/adspyder.io\/blog\/brand-keyword-bidding-banned\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/adspyder.io\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Who-is-Stealing-Your-Brand-Keyword.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/adspyder.io\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2026\/05\/Who-is-Stealing-Your-Brand-Keyword.jpg","width":1731,"height":909,"caption":"Who is Stealing Your Brand Keyword"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/adspyder.io\/blog\/brand-keyword-bidding-banned\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"blog","item":"https:\/\/adspyder.io\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Brand Protection","item":"https:\/\/adspyder.io\/blog\/category\/brand-protection\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"We Analysed 25 of the World’s Biggest Brand Keyword Auctions | 8.5M Ads Reveal What Competitors Are Actually Doing in 2026"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/adspyder.io\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/adspyder.io\/blog\/","name":"AdSpyder","description":"Spy on Your Competitors","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/adspyder.io\/blog\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/adspyder.io\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/adspyder.io\/blog\/#organization","name":"AdSpyder","url":"https:\/\/adspyder.io\/blog\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/adspyder.io\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/adspyder.io\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/MicrosoftTeams-image-89-1.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/adspyder.io\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/MicrosoftTeams-image-89-1.png","width":300,"height":300,"caption":"AdSpyder"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/adspyder.io\/blog\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/adspyder.io\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/019f20ac9229517cfc2d66b908b656f0","name":"Abhishek Singh","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/adspyder.io\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/ecceb4f04c0c06c78df7d35567f4c454e8db1d7d2bd4ca394f3785876c606703?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/ecceb4f04c0c06c78df7d35567f4c454e8db1d7d2bd4ca394f3785876c606703?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Abhishek Singh"},"url":"https:\/\/adspyder.io\/blog\/author\/abhishek\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/adspyder.io\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/41805","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/adspyder.io\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/adspyder.io\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/adspyder.io\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/27"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/adspyder.io\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=41805"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/adspyder.io\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/41805\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":41816,"href":"https:\/\/adspyder.io\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/41805\/revisions\/41816"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/adspyder.io\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/41811"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/adspyder.io\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=41805"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/adspyder.io\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=41805"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/adspyder.io\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=41805"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}